Home

Environmentally friendly nature management as one of the main conditions for sustainable development

Скачать статью

Mikhail Sergeevich Kubarev, Margarita Nikolaevna Ignat'eva

M. S. Kubarev, M. N. Ignat'eva / News of the Ural State Mining University 1 (2018) 94–100 DOI 10.21440/2307-2091-2018-1-94-100

УДК 338.2:502

DOI 10.21440/2307-2091-2018-1-94-100

The relevance of the study: In the modern theory of sustainable development, a number of issues of theoretical and methodological nature are understudied. In particular, the rationale for environmentally friendly nature management is one of such. This does not allow a sufficient degree of efficiency to carry out state regulation of natural resources.

The purpose of the study was to develop theoretical principles of eco-development as well as methodological foundations of the environmentally friendly nature management. Research methods: scientific generalization and systematic, logical and comparative analysis. The article discusses the stages of the nature development theory and its association with the concept of eco-development, sustainable development and protection of nature. They were formed in the mid-twentieth century as a practical activity and at the same time as a scientific concept. The article reveals the essence of the concept of natural resources’ rational use, the formation and development of this concept. It is firstly considered from the perspective of economical, careful integrated use of natural resources and, secondly, from the perspective of completeness of accounting of social and environmental consequences. This is done on the basis of the socio-economic approach. The specific features of the balance of nature use within the biosphere concept and the recognition of the need to preserve the mechanism of biotic regulation are revealed. This is interpreted in the light of ensuring the ecological and economic balance. This economic balance assumes a balanced ratio of territories of different degrees of disturbance and, accordingly, it presumes different types of their use. The concurrent studies, focused on ensuring the balance of nature within the territorial complexes are also being analyzed. This involves comparing natural productive capacity with the ecological intensity of technology. The aforementioned reflects the biosphere and anthropogenic parity in ecological and economic systems. Changes in the direction of research in the conditions of transition to sustainable development and the use of the risk theory provisions are revealed. The views of the authors regarding the relationship of environmental security, ecological sustainability and environmentally sound management are stated. The increasing role of the directions of nature use connected with the protection and restoration of the natural resources is proven. The author’s definition of eco-acceptable use of natural resources and the fundamental principles, which characterize them, are formed. When taken into account, they make it possible to increase the efficiency of state regulation of natural resources through the development of the most reasonable strategy. The mechanism for the implementation of the main sustainable development directions is also formed.

Keywords: environmentally friendly nature management; eco-development; sustainable development; environmental security; nature protection; recovery; balance; principles.

 

REFERENCES

1. Commoner B. 1974, Zamykayushchiy krug (priroda. chelovek. tekhnologii) [The Closing circle (nature, people, and technology)]. Leningrad, 272 p.

2. Jean Dorst. 1968, Do togo kak umret priroda: per. s frants. [Before nature dies. Translated from the French]. Moscow, 415 p.

3. Armand D. L. 1975, Nauka o landshafte [Science of the landscape]. Moscow, 286 p.

4. Kurazhkovsky Yu. N. 1969, Ocherki prirodopol’zovaniya [Essays on environmental management]. Moscow, 268 p.

5. Peccei A. 1969, The chasm ahead. New York, 297 c.

6. Armand D. L. 1966, Nam i vnukam [For us and for our grandchildren]. Moscow, 252 p.

7. Kapitsa A. P., Mukhin G. D. Zengina T. Yu. 2012, Istoriya stanovleniya nauchnoy shkoly ratsionalnogo prirodopol’zovaniya na geograficheskom fakul’tete MGU / pod. obshch. red. prof. M. V. Slipenchuka. v sb. "Ratsionalnoye prirodopolzovaniye: teoriya, praktika, obrazovaniye" [The history of the formation of the environmental management scientific school at the faculty of geography in the Moscow state University. Under the General editorship of Professor M. V. Slipenchuk. “Environmental management: theory, practice, and education”]. Moscow, pp. 4–10.

8. Isachenko A. G. 1980, Optimizatsiya prirodnoy sredy [Optimization of the environment]. Moscow, 264 p.

9. Larichkin F. D. 2004, Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost' ratsionalnogo prirodopolzovaniya v gornorudnoy promyshlennosti: avtoref. … d-ra ekon. nauk [Economic efficiency of rational nature management in mining industry: A synopsis of the dissertation of the Doctor of Economic Sciences]. St. Petersburg, 46 p.

10. Kharlampovich G. L., Berezyuk V. G., Lipunov I. N., Yevtyukhova O. V., Chernyayev A. M. 1993, Okhrana i ratsionalnoye ispolzovaniye okruzhayushchey sredy [Protection and rational use of the environment]. Ekaterinburg, 184 p.

11. Agoshkov M. I. 1982, Razvitiye idei i praktiki kompleksnogo osvoyeniya nedr. Nauchnyy doklad [Developing the idea of comprehensive exploitation of mineral resources and its implementation in practice. A scientific report]. Moscow, 74 p.

12. Kozakov E. M., Pakhomov V. P., Ignat'eva M. N. 1992, Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoye obosnovaniye osvoyeniya mineralnykh resursov [Socio-economic assessment of mineral resources]. Ekaterinburg, 112 p.

13. Ignat'eva M. N. 2014, Osnovnyye polozheniya geoekosotsioekonomicheskogo podkhoda k osvoyeniyu prirodnykh resursov [The main provisions of the geo-economic and socio-economic approach to the development of natural resources]. Izv. UGGU [News of the Ural State Mining University], no. 3 (35), pp. 74–80.

14. 2015, Razvitiye sistemnosti v osvoyenii prirodnogo potentsiala severnykh maloizuchennykh territoriy [The growth of systematics in the development of the natural potential of the northern poorly studied territories]. Edited by A. I. Tatarkin. Ekaterinburg, 317 p.

15. Milanova E. V., Ryabchikov A. M. 1986, Ispol'zovaniye prirodnykh resursov i okhrana prirody [The use of natural resources and the protection of nature]. Moscow, 280 p.

16. Oldak P. G. 1983, Ravnovesnoye prirodopolzovaniye. Vzglyad ekonomista [Balanced nature management. An economist’s perspective]. Novosibirsk, 128 p.

17. Danilov-Danilyan V. I., Gorshkov V. G., Arsky Yu. M., Losev K. S. 1994, Okruzhayushchaya sreda mezhdu proshlym i budushchim: Mir i Rossiya [Environment between past and future: Russia and the World]. Moscow, 133 p.

18. Lotka A. J. 1925, Elements of physical biology. Baltimore, 495 p.

19. Vernadskiy N. I. 1987, Khimicheskoye stroyeniye biosfery i yeyo okruzheniya [Chemical structure of the biosphere and its environment]. Moscow, 339 p.

20. Lovelok J. E. 1988, The ages of Gaia: a biography of our living Earth. N. Y., 252 p. 21. Gorshkov V. G. 1995, Fizicheskiye i biofizicheskiye osnovy ustoychivosti zhizni [Physical and biophysical foundations of life stability]. Moscow, 470 p.

22. Danilov-Danilyan V. I., Losev K. S. 2000, Ekonomicheskiy vyzov i ustoychivoye razvitiye [Economic challenge and sustainable development]. Moscow, 416 p.

23. Losev K. S. 2011, Mify i zabluzhdeniya v ekologii [Myths and misconceptions of ecology]. Moscow, 224 p.

24. Kondratyev K. Ya., Losev K. S., Ananicheva M. D., Chesnokova I. V. 2003, Estestvenno-nauchnyye osnovy ustoychivosti zhizni [Natural-science basis of life stability]. Moscow, 240 p.

25. Lebedev Yu. V. 2015, Teoreticheskiye osnovy ekologicheski ustoychivogo razvitiya territorii: patrioticheskiy vzglyad [Theoretical foundations of ecologically sustainable development of the territory: a patriotic view]. Ekaterinburg,156 p.

26. Kochurov B. I., Lobkovskiy V. A., Smirnov A. Ya. 2013, Kontseptsiya effektivnogo prirodopol'zovaniya v aspekte ustoychivogo razvitiya [The concept of effective nature management in the aspect of sustainable development]. Problemy regional'noy ekologii [Problems of regional ecology], no. 3, pp. 136–143.

27. Kochurov B. I., Ivanov Yu. G. 1996, Ekologo-khozyaystvennoye ustroystvo territorii kak mekhanizm realizatsii ustoychivogo razvitiya [Ecological-economic system of the territory as a mechanism for the implementation of sustainable development]. Problemy regionalnoy ekologii [Regional Environmental Issues], no. 1, pp. 31–36.

28. Kochurov B. I. 1995, Balans ekologii i khozyaystva [The balance of ecology and economy]. Zemlya i Vselennaya [Earth and Universe], no. 4, pp. 39–44.

29. Kochurov B. I. 1997, Ekologo-khozyaystvennyy sbalansirovannyy podkhod k razvitiyu regiona [Ecological and economic balanced approach to the development of the region]. Sotsial'no-ekologicheskiye prioritety garmonizatsii i aktivizatsii soznatel'noy deyatelnosti lyudey v promyshlennykh tsentrakh: Materialy Vseros. nauchno-prakt. konf. [Social and ecological priorities of harmonization and activation of people’s conscious activity in the industrial centers: Materials of the all-Russian theoretical and practical Conference]. Berezniki, pp. 31–35.

30. Reimers N. F. 1995, Kolonny khrama prirody [The pillars of the temple of nature]. Priroda i chelovek [Nature and man], no. 6, pp. 31–33.

31. Vladimirov V. V. 1999, Urboekologiya [Urboecology]. Moscow, 204 p.

32. Glazyrina I. P., Strizhenova T. A. 2001, Tselostnost’ ekosistem i upravleniye prirodnymi resursami na regional’nom urovne [The ecosystems integrity and natural resource management on the regional level]. Izv. RAN. Ser. geografich. [Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya], no. 3, pp. 75–82.

33. Moiseenkova T. A., Haskin V. V. 1992, Metodika rascheta ekologicheskoy tekhnoyemkosti territorii (k proyektu 2.5.6.) [Methodology for calculating the environmental capacity of the territory (to the project 2.5.6)]. Moscow, 48 p.

34. Ignatov V. G., Kokin A. V. 1998, Prirodookhrannoye i prirodoresursnoye regulirovaniye v usloviyakh ustoychivogo razvitiya [Environmental regulation in conditions of sustainable development]. Region: teoriya i praktika ustoychivogo razvitiya [The region: theory and practice of sustainable development]. Moscow, pp. 54–65.

35. Belik I. S. 2008, Otsenka i diagnostika ekologo-ekonomicheskogo bezopasnogo razvitiya territorii [The assessment and diagnostics of ecological and economical safe development of the territory]. Ekaterinburg, 271 p. 36. Kochurov B. I., Marunich N. A. 2016, Ekologo-energeticheskiy analiz ekosistem [Ecological and energy analysis of ecosystems]. Moscow, 144 p.

37. Podolinsky S. A. 1880, Trud cheloveka i ego otnosheniye k raspredeleniyu energii [Human labor and its relation to the energy distribution] Slovo [The Word], Volume IV-V, pp. 135 – 211.

38. 1989, Nashe obshcheye budushcheye: doklad MKOSR: per. s angl. [Our common future: report of sustainable development. Translated from English]. Moscow, 376 p.

39. Golubetskaya N. P. 2001, Sbalansirovannoye prirodopolzovaniye v usloviyakh perekhodnoy ekonomiki: dis. … d-ra ekon. nauk [Sustainable use of natural resources in a transition economy: dissertation of the Doctor of economic sciences], St. Petersburg, 218 p.

40. Petrova T. E. 1998, Metodicheskiye osnovy otsenki ekologicheski ustoychivogo razvitiya regiona: dis. … kand. ekon. nauk [Methodical bases of an assessment of environmentally sustainable development of the region: dissertation of the Candidate of economic sciences]. Moscow, 170 p.

Лицензия Creative Commons
All articles posted on the site are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Global License.