Socio-economic valuation of an employee’s work activities of a coal mining enterprise: Criteria, indicators, and methodology

 

M. N. Poleshchuk / News of the Ural State Mining University. 2021. Issue 1(61), pp. 150-159

https://doi.org/10.21440/2307-2091-2021-1-150-159

 

Relevance is caused by the fact that the achievement of the required performance results is based on the mutual understanding
of the workers of a coal mining enterprise and the consistency of their interaction. It is advisable to carry out a socio-economic
valuation and mutual assessment of their activities to effectively change these components. For a correct assessment of the
activities of employees, it is necessary to determine the criteria and indicators that reflect its socio-economic characteristics and
the results achieved by employees.
Purpose of the paper is to present a methodological toolkit that allows employees of a coal mining enterprise to carry out a socioeconomic
valuation and mutual assessment of their activities, to develop measures for improving its efficiency.
Research methodology and methods. The socio-economic valuation of employees work activities is based on the following
provisions: 1) the results of the employee’s activities and the process of achieving them are assessed; 2) an employee himself
makes the assessment as well as other employees interacting with him (manager, colleagues, subordinates). When substantiating
the criteria and indicators, the methods of structural and functional analysis, scientific generalization and expert assessments
were used.
Results. A set of criteria and indicators have been substantiated reflecting the attitude of employees to activities, the process of
their activities and the results they achieve. A method of socio-economic valuation of activities is proposed, the application of
which allows identifying discrepancies in assessments, to achieve mutual understanding between interacting employees, their
managers and colleagues, to develop relationships that ensure the required results of interaction.
Conclusions. Socio-economic valuation of an employee’s work activities of a coal mining enterprise according to the proposed
methodology using a reasonable set of criteria and indicators allows you to form an agreed understanding of the requirements for
the activity and its results, to develop and implement effective measures to achieve the desired results
Keywords: indicators and criteria, methodology, activity, coal mining enterprise, employee, socio-economic valuation, mutual
understanding, relationships, interaction, results.

 

REFERENCES

1. Danilov-Danilyan V. I., 2003 Economic and mathematical encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow, 688 p.
2. Krysko V. 2003, Dictionary and reference book on social psychology. St. Petersburg, 416 p.
3. Ranängen H., Lindman Å. 2018, Exploring corporate social responsibility practice versus stakeholder interests in Nordic mining. Journal of
Cleaner Production, vol. 197, part 1, pp. 668–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.159
4. Volkov S. A., Mashnyuk A. N., Konakova O. V. 2019, Motivational environment of a coal mining enterprise: Content, state, development directions.
Ugol’ [Coal], no. 8, pp. 62–69. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2019-8-62-68
5. Kilin A. B., Galkin V. A., Makarov A. M. Market relations in a coal mine and production efficiency. Ugol’ [Coal], no. 9, pp. 29–34. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2020-9-29-34
A., Makarov A. M. 1997, Teoreticheskiye osnovy i metody obespecheniya zhiznesposobnosti ugledobyvayushchego predpriyatiya [Theoretical
foundations and methods for ensuring the viability of a coal mining enterprise], PhD thesis. Chelyabinsk, 211 p.
7. Kozovoy G. I. 1998, Organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskoye obespecheniye innovatsionnoy deyatel’nosti ugledobyvayushchego predpriyatiya
[Organizational and technological support of innovative activities of a coal mining enterprise], PhD thesis. Saint Petersburg, 244 p.
8. Prokopenko S. A. 1999, Organizatsiya ugol’nogo proizvodstva v usloviyakh konkurentnogo vzaimodeystviya [Organization of coal production
in the context of competitive interaction]. Chelyabinsk, 285 p.
9. Kesselring R. 2018, At an extractive pace: Conflicting temporalities in a resettlement process in Solwezi, Zambia. The Extractive Industries and
Society, vol. 5, issue 2, pp. 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.02.008
10. Artemyev V. B. Volkov S. A., Lisovsky V. V., Galkin V. A., Makarov A. M., Zakharov S. I. 2019, Approaches to increasing the competitiveness of
a coal mining enterprise and its personnel. Ugol’ [Coal], no. 6, pp. 4–9. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2019-6-4-9
11. Artemyev V. B., Galkin V. A., Kravchuk I. L. 2015, Bezopasnost’ proizvodstva (organizatsionnyy aspekt) [Production safety (organizational
aspect)]. Moscow, 159 p.
12. Zhukov A. L. 2008, Optimizatsiya parametrov rabochikh ploshchadok razrezov pri podgotovke zapasov uglya k vyyemke [Optimization of the
parameters of the working sites of open-pit mines when preparing coal reserves for extraction]. Ekaterinburg, 140 p.
13. Kuletsky V. N. 2013, Razrabotka kompleksa resheniy po formirovaniyu ugol’nogo razreza novogo tekhniko-tekhnologicheskogo urovnya [Development
of a set of solutions for the formation of a coal mine of a new technical and technological level]. Chelyabinsk, 159 p.
14. Galkin V. A., Makarov A. M., Zakharov S. I., Poleshchuk M. N. 2019, Method of calculating the reserve of the working time of the coal producer
staff for the purpose of its development. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo gornogo universiteta [News of the Ural State Mining University],
no. 2 (54), pp. 134–145. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.21440/2307-2091-2019-2-134-145
15. Buinitsky A. I., Poleshchuk M. N. 2017, O povyshenii konkordatsii personala na razreze «Berezovskiy» [On increasing personnel concordance
at the Berezovsky open-pit mine]. Open mining operations in the XXI century: Results, problems and prospects of development: materials of the III
International scientific and practical Conference, Mining Information and Analytical bulletin, in 2 vol., no. 12 (special issue 37), vol. 1, pp. 346–358.
(In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.25018/0236-1493-2017-12-32-346-358
16. Galkina N. V. 2007, Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskaya adaptatsiya ugledobyvayushchego predpriyatiya k innovatsionnoy modeli tekhnologicheskogo
razvitiya [Socio-economic adaptation of a coal mining enterprise to an innovative model of technological development]. Moscow, 248 p.
17. Dobrovolsky A. I. 2011, Mechanism for ensuring effective production control in a coal mining association. Ugol’ [Coal], no. 4, pp. 61–63. (In
Russ.)

Лицензия Creative Commons
All articles posted on the site are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Global License.